Skip to content

Comment on Why are there no flow batteries with symmetric ferrocyanide electrolytes?parent

Comments

The public is not going to buy a flow battery anyway.

Or perhaps they will, but only when public is taken in the context as in public utility or public city. But individuals are not going to buy a flow battery, it is a chemical plant.

If we're going to do chemical-plant scale utility batteries, why not just lead-acid? It's well understood, simple, and the ingredients are cheap. Yes lead is toxic but it's easily contained and recyclable.

I think the very fact that PbS and for that matter NiFe have been around for decades and aren't widely deployed for utility scale probably counts against it. I suspect the answer may be that weight matters enough just in the cost of delivery to the site. Where utility scale storage is being deployed it's lithium; may switch to sodium as that crosses over in cost.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.