I'm not sure why you're arguing that when it's not the point of the statement.

'twas an expression of surprise, not an argument.

Surprise in both directions, 'cause what you like about Claude is one of the ways it fails for me.

Now do an analysis of the people at your company.

It was mandatory at several of them.

Regex the pattern over time if you want to make an argument against my supporting example.

I wonder which of the various employers I've had in the last decade would consider me regexing commits to be an NDA violation?

I choose not to discover.