I kind of agree that the post is a bit too far away from the trenches to be able to claim it will reveal "software engineering reality".
From where I snipe, I see a big divide between those...
1) that try to surrender to AI, aiming to fully replace value-added intellectual effort and often also to augment enterprise value-mask slop busywork...
...they fail, and succeed, and the collective suffers.
2) those that ride AI to get more challenged, more feedback if any kind, to tread further but with attention to the right details
Comments
I kind of agree that the post is a bit too far away from the trenches to be able to claim it will reveal "software engineering reality".
From where I snipe, I see a big divide between those...
1) that try to surrender to AI, aiming to fully replace value-added intellectual effort and often also to augment enterprise value-mask slop busywork...
...they fail, and succeed, and the collective suffers.
2) those that ride AI to get more challenged, more feedback if any kind, to tread further but with attention to the right details
...they succeed