My problem with memory is that it goes stale, and updates to facts are often not changing all locations of that fact. Such a system should make it easier to maintain a single source of truth, and versioning, no?
Yes you need a VCS and to recalculate relationships at certain thresholds. It adds a lot of complexity and computarional overhead, which is why there's no uniform widespread graph use
Oh, interesting, is this based on your experience, or is there a reference I could look up? My layman intuition is better grounding should result in more accurate results, is that not the same as better reasoning?
Comments
This is great for evidence grounding, but doesn't produce a large memory/reasoning improvement (in most cases)
My problem with memory is that it goes stale, and updates to facts are often not changing all locations of that fact. Such a system should make it easier to maintain a single source of truth, and versioning, no?
Yes you need a VCS and to recalculate relationships at certain thresholds. It adds a lot of complexity and computarional overhead, which is why there's no uniform widespread graph use
Oh, interesting, is this based on your experience, or is there a reference I could look up? My layman intuition is better grounding should result in more accurate results, is that not the same as better reasoning?