Skip to content

Comment on Don't use musl if you care about performance

Comments

Posted this the other day but the whole musl allocator thing seems to be well known [0]

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45143347

Musl's allocator being awful is pretty well known, though mostly in that it's absolutely awful in multithreaded context. TFA points out that musl has a bunch of other noticeably slower functions, which is less well known (though they're also slower by a smaller factor, and they don't worsen as your parallelism increases).

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.