Skip to content

Comment on Rubio Uses Terrorism Law to Ban Secure Email Service

Comments

violent

The mentioned entity is making accusations: the point could be that an authoritative institutional judgement is missing (at list in the article) to establish a responsibility.

In fact, the target's rebuttal was «false allegations made by a politically desperate administration with the sole intention of swaying people and media attention away from their own violence and warmongering».

our civilization

The mentioned entity is making boasting statements: again more justifications should be provided in order to make the stated less perplexing.

(Corrige: 'at list' → 'at least')

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.