Skip to content

Comment on Copyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license "vibe code"?

Comments

I think authorship is linked to the direction of the tool.

Statistical models are everywhere. Digital photos are a good example, nobody questions your authorship when you prompt the camera to capture a picture, while the result comes from a statistical model.

Direction is what gives a work meaning. Just having a llm output something without directing it, is meaningless, it's not a work.

Trying to draw a line at a certain level of involvement seems unnecessary and impossible to me.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.