Even if, hypothetically, company knows what user is searching for before user finishes typing a query, it does not mean company is going to deliver it to user
Company is paid by advertisers, not users
Company can deliver something _popular_, call it "relevant", make bank
"Popular" grows audience, good for advertisers
"Relevant" not necessarily good for advertisers, only good for user
Company serves its customers: advertisers
Company does not need PageRank to determine popularity, only search traffic (search query data)
(Of course a result could be both relevant and popular. But a result could also be relevant and _unpopular_. Company is promotes the former to the exclusion of the later. It profits by selling advertising services to advertisers, not information services to www users)
Comments
Popularity is not equal to relevance
Except in the case of advertising
Even if, hypothetically, company knows what user is searching for before user finishes typing a query, it does not mean company is going to deliver it to user
Company is paid by advertisers, not users
Company can deliver something _popular_, call it "relevant", make bank
"Popular" grows audience, good for advertisers
"Relevant" not necessarily good for advertisers, only good for user
Company serves its customers: advertisers
Company does not need PageRank to determine popularity, only search traffic (search query data)
(Of course a result could be both relevant and popular. But a result could also be relevant and _unpopular_. Company is promotes the former to the exclusion of the later. It profits by selling advertising services to advertisers, not information services to www users)
To stay on top, the company buys search traffic
For example, paying vendors to be the "default" search engine