Skip to content

Comment on PageRank explained

Comments

Popularity is not equal to relevance

Except in the case of advertising

Even if, hypothetically, company knows what user is searching for before user finishes typing a query, it does not mean company is going to deliver it to user

Company is paid by advertisers, not users

Company can deliver something _popular_, call it "relevant", make bank

"Popular" grows audience, good for advertisers

"Relevant" not necessarily good for advertisers, only good for user

Company serves its customers: advertisers

Company does not need PageRank to determine popularity, only search traffic (search query data)

(Of course a result could be both relevant and popular. But a result could also be relevant and _unpopular_. Company is promotes the former to the exclusion of the later. It profits by selling advertising services to advertisers, not information services to www users)

To stay on top, the company buys search traffic

For example, paying vendors to be the "default" search engine

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.