Comment on Erik Brynjolfsson says an AI "job apocalypse" is unlikelyComments−add-sub-mul-div19dIf the number of jobs stays constant but a lot of those jobs have been downgraded to gig labor without benefits, that's bad.If the number of jobs stays constant but a lot of those jobs have been downgraded to fungible operators of AI, that's very bad.−unified10118dGig labour has existing before AI, infact techies built it. Where was the "that's very bad" then?Smells of hypocricy. And if the world didn't really change for gig workers before, why would it now?
Comments
If the number of jobs stays constant but a lot of those jobs have been downgraded to gig labor without benefits, that's bad.
If the number of jobs stays constant but a lot of those jobs have been downgraded to fungible operators of AI, that's very bad.
Gig labour has existing before AI, infact techies built it. Where was the "that's very bad" then?
Smells of hypocricy. And if the world didn't really change for gig workers before, why would it now?