Can you elaborate what does "framework runtime where concurrency and parallelism are first-class primitives" means?
Because to take Flask for example - it can run the "sync code" example on your page perfectly. It even has thread-pool support, if you run it via gunicorn.
And if you want to mix sync and async code, you can do this too: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/stable/async-await/
So what exactly is the innovation of your framework compared to that?
Perhaps the easiest way to explain this would be to show some code (non-working is fine) and say: "this thing is easy in my framework, but very hard / impossible in existing ones, like Flask". I think this is what you tried to do with "what if we simply wrote" section, but you kinda failed because you can already do this anyway.
Comments
Can you elaborate what does "framework runtime where concurrency and parallelism are first-class primitives" means?
Because to take Flask for example - it can run the "sync code" example on your page perfectly. It even has thread-pool support, if you run it via gunicorn. And if you want to mix sync and async code, you can do this too: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/stable/async-await/
So what exactly is the innovation of your framework compared to that? Perhaps the easiest way to explain this would be to show some code (non-working is fine) and say: "this thing is easy in my framework, but very hard / impossible in existing ones, like Flask". I think this is what you tried to do with "what if we simply wrote" section, but you kinda failed because you can already do this anyway.