Comment on Dynamical dark energy and the week that broke cosmologyparentComments−ck219dmath is simply a working model of the observedmath doesn't try to explain whymath also allows predictions without understanding whyit's a placeholder to get things doneie. correction factorsEinstein thought the universe was static but his math would not fitSo he made a "cosmological constant" to make static universe math fitHubble later used science to figure out the universe was expanding, not staticEinstein said "whoops" and threw out the constantExcept his math was right even without understanding why, it was just a model of the observedThe "cosmological constant" actually measures dark energy without even knowing what it wasPretty amazing IMHO
Comments
math is simply a working model of the observed
math doesn't try to explain why
math also allows predictions without understanding why
it's a placeholder to get things done
ie. correction factors
Einstein thought the universe was static but his math would not fit
So he made a "cosmological constant" to make static universe math fit
Hubble later used science to figure out the universe was expanding, not static
Einstein said "whoops" and threw out the constant
Except his math was right even without understanding why, it was just a model of the observed
The "cosmological constant" actually measures dark energy without even knowing what it was
Pretty amazing IMHO