Yes, memory was the main issue. The PC launched with 64KB of RAM. Technically there was a model with 16KB of RAM and no disk drive but I don't think they produced or sold many of those.
I could get the extra 48KB memory for less than IBM charged. More importantly, double sided floppy drives were already on the market but you couldn't get them from IBM at any price.
So I went to a local component supplier and got a pair of double sided drives. They worked "out of the box" in DOS, but unsurprisingly, only side 1 of each drive showed up as A: and B: drives.
So I wrote a TSR to add C: and D: drive letterss which were side 2 of each drive.
It was super easy.
Later I heard about a fancier TSR that combined side 1 and 2 of each drive into a single drive letter with twice the capacity.
But that was a much more complicated task, and I was happy enough with my four-drive-letter solution.
Technically it could be expanded all the way to 640KB
But only the first 256 KB was on the motherboard, you needed a memory expansion card for the extra 384 KB, and I don't think they really existed in 1982.
Actually, you could somewhat break the 640KB limit in the early days (not that most people could afford that much RAM) days. Until EGA came along in 1984, there was free address space upto 704KB that you could use as conventional memory without much issue (or 736KB if you limited yourself to CGA).
And later we had the mess of EMS, which would work on the original 5150 with the right expansion card (and the right software to take advantage of it, like Lotus 123)
Right, that ROM BASIC was such a waste for them for years.
Some clone makers quickly found out ways take advantage of that space adding more RAM there. Then bit later it came area where you could even map over 1MB placed memory blocks there with a config.sys loaded driver.
Comments
Yes, memory was the main issue. The PC launched with 64KB of RAM. Technically there was a model with 16KB of RAM and no disk drive but I don't think they produced or sold many of those.
16KB and no floppy drive. That was my first PC!
I could get the extra 48KB memory for less than IBM charged. More importantly, double sided floppy drives were already on the market but you couldn't get them from IBM at any price.
So I went to a local component supplier and got a pair of double sided drives. They worked "out of the box" in DOS, but unsurprisingly, only side 1 of each drive showed up as A: and B: drives.
So I wrote a TSR to add C: and D: drive letterss which were side 2 of each drive.
It was super easy.
Later I heard about a fancier TSR that combined side 1 and 2 of each drive into a single drive letter with twice the capacity.
But that was a much more complicated task, and I was happy enough with my four-drive-letter solution.
640
64, not 640.
Well, 16 KB - 256 KB, with a directly addressable 64 KB and a segmented architecture to reach further.
I had one of these in mid 1982 to late https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Personal_Computer
Technically it could be expanded all the way to 640KB
But only the first 256 KB was on the motherboard, you needed a memory expansion card for the extra 384 KB, and I don't think they really existed in 1982.
Actually, you could somewhat break the 640KB limit in the early days (not that most people could afford that much RAM) days. Until EGA came along in 1984, there was free address space upto 704KB that you could use as conventional memory without much issue (or 736KB if you limited yourself to CGA).
And later we had the mess of EMS, which would work on the original 5150 with the right expansion card (and the right software to take advantage of it, like Lotus 123)
And it included a cassette interface.
And BASIC in ROM.
Right, that ROM BASIC was such a waste for them for years.
Some clone makers quickly found out ways take advantage of that space adding more RAM there. Then bit later it came area where you could even map over 1MB placed memory blocks there with a config.sys loaded driver.