It's so very clear why he thought it was a good idea to have a regex validator to check that he doesn't imply he still works at Github.
"i dont work at github"
"Yes, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the mistake and have edited the document accordingly.
reads War and Peace system prompt
Here is how we can programmatically and scientifically avoid this problem in the future:
1. Add to the regex validator library: We can add to the regex validator library an additional entry to catch any future instances of this mistake. This is a low-cost, high-yield approach---regex runs with deterministic and repeatable results, with the added benefit that its big-O runtime scales at most linearly with the size of the text for most use cases (Hartmann, 2018).
Comments
Yours instantly! 576 pages!
It's so very clear why he thought it was a good idea to have a regex validator to check that he doesn't imply he still works at Github.
"i dont work at github"
"Yes, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the mistake and have edited the document accordingly.
reads War and Peace system prompt
Here is how we can programmatically and scientifically avoid this problem in the future:
1. Add to the regex validator library: We can add to the regex validator library an additional entry to catch any future instances of this mistake. This is a low-cost, high-yield approach---regex runs with deterministic and repeatable results, with the added benefit that its big-O runtime scales at most linearly with the size of the text for most use cases (Hartmann, 2018).
*Three other braindead ideas*
Which future-proofing strategy shall we take?"
"sure 1"