"Reasoning from a sibling product generates confident, plausible, wrong answers. These each burned real time before collapsing."
May I ask what exactly did you intend to mean when you wrote this sentence? it seems to me it's a bit all over the place, not sure what the purpose was in writing that one. It and many others here seem to be indeed burning some of my real time before collapsing into that question of: what's the precise intent.
Comments
Reverse engineering my cheap Chinese microscope told me it rather identifies as a dashcam.
If I may quote you:
"Reasoning from a sibling product generates confident, plausible, wrong answers. These each burned real time before collapsing."
May I ask what exactly did you intend to mean when you wrote this sentence? it seems to me it's a bit all over the place, not sure what the purpose was in writing that one. It and many others here seem to be indeed burning some of my real time before collapsing into that question of: what's the precise intent.
I miss when people would proofread things before they published.