Skip to content

Comment on Simplifying and Refactoring Introductory Calculus (2018)

Comments

Thanks for the shout-out! I teach calculus to homeschool co-op students regularly, and I got tired of the existing books on the market (I used to teach from Saxon Calculus) so I wrote my own, "Calculus from the Ground Up". This paper represents the principles I used for writing the book.

Interestingly, my reformulation of the Leibniz notation for the second derivative was actually the result of writing the book. I was wanting to write a piece on why the second derivative looks the way it does. I had about 10 different calculus books I was looking through trying to find a solid answer and there was none. So, I eventually decided to try and derive the formula myself. I was quite surprised when I was able to derive a formula, but it was different. I tried to figure out for a while how to get from my formula to the standard one, until I eventually realized that the standard formulation was itself problematic.

It's in the "Calculus from the Ground Up" book as "Appendix B", but I don't use it in the main text so as not to confuse students who take further calculus courses. I found a middle ground for the book which neither forces the new notation nor commits the mistakes of the previous one. The book is not heavy in higher-order derivatives anyway, so the usage is minimal.

On the second derivative side, a fuller treatment (including applying the approach to partial differentials) is given in the paper "Total and Partial Differentials as Algebraically Manipulable Entities".

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07958

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.