Germanic tribes did colonize northern Italy and eventually used the local latin language with heavy borrowings from their original language.
Not sure why you used the word "colonizer" for Jews living in Germany. Perhaps I misunderstood, but given the book you referenced I made an educated guess
« used the word "colonizer" for Jews living in Germany »
I didn't. Rather, "Germans" (Suebians, Saxons, etc) settled in ("colonized") Eastern Europe, beyond the Empire, typically at the invitation of the local rulers.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hochmittelalterliche_Ostsiedlu...
That's where the contact with Eastern Jews happened, which, according to Koestler, gave rise to Yiddish.
Yes, the Langobards and the Goths settling in Italy and Spain lost their language, but the medieval Germans settling in Eastern Europe a couple hundred years later did not.
Comments
Germanic tribes did colonize northern Italy and eventually used the local latin language with heavy borrowings from their original language.
Not sure why you used the word "colonizer" for Jews living in Germany. Perhaps I misunderstood, but given the book you referenced I made an educated guess
« used the word "colonizer" for Jews living in Germany »
I didn't. Rather, "Germans" (Suebians, Saxons, etc) settled in ("colonized") Eastern Europe, beyond the Empire, typically at the invitation of the local rulers. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hochmittelalterliche_Ostsiedlu... That's where the contact with Eastern Jews happened, which, according to Koestler, gave rise to Yiddish.
Yes, the Langobards and the Goths settling in Italy and Spain lost their language, but the medieval Germans settling in Eastern Europe a couple hundred years later did not.