Fair enough to all of that; even though I did read TFA, I guess the (original, crappy) headline threw me off because it seemed like it was implying that Taco Bell should have received more than 2.5% of the affected lettuce, and I was like "Well obviously Taco Bell is just one of many businesses in the supply chain, that seems like an accurate amount to me."

Which is the wrong angle on my part, but leads to the same point about it being dubious to throw Taco Bell under the bus here.