>
1. Open up the platform, or
2. Go down the same road that they went down in the 80s/90s, handing the bulk of the business over to an open platform.
>
You gave two options at a crossroads as a result of a maps fiasco, both options end up with the "open" solution winning. My reading comprehension is fine, your arguments are faulty.
Comments
The maps fiasco makes it clear that Apple is at a crossroads: They can
1. Open up the platform, or
2. Go down the same road that they went down in the 80s/90s, handing the bulk of the business over to an open platform.
I know which way I'm betting this turns out.
All roads lead to open by way of a maps fiasco? I can't even begin to diagram your thought process.
> All roads lead to open by way of a maps fiasco?
Where did I say/imply "All roads lead to open"? I can't even begin to diagram your method of reading comprehension.
> 1. Open up the platform, or 2. Go down the same road that they went down in the 80s/90s, handing the bulk of the business over to an open platform. >
You gave two options at a crossroads as a result of a maps fiasco, both options end up with the "open" solution winning. My reading comprehension is fine, your arguments are faulty.
> both options end up with the "open" solution winning.
I see you've changed from "all roads lead to open", so it's a start. Keep going.
Edit: On second thought, don't. This thread doesn't have a lot going for it, I'm out.