Skip to content

Comment on When online commenters detect my art as AI

Comments

I do AI assisted images for fun and browsing their art I can't see any tell of AI or even tracing on AI; people became paranoid and jump to conclusion without any substance and I find it sad that people who put a lot of time and effort into their craft are getting knee jerks comments like this.

people became paranoid and jump to conclusion without any substance

Before AI, the only question was who made a particular artwork. Human-created practically a certainty.

When AI-generated art was new, it was all exiting & the process described to boast about AI capabilities or the skills of people deploying AI. But human-created still the default assumption.

Now, AI-generated <anything> is everywhere, and that default assumption of "human-created" is often questioned.

The natural next step is "AI-generated" as default assumption, unless claimed / shown (or even proven) otherwise.

Imho: assumption is the root of all evil. Investigate! Or take an author's word for it unless they're shown to be a liar. But as another commenter noted, it's a kind of tragedy of the commons. Methods to prove you as a human created <artwork> will be a thing.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.