Skip to content

Comment on Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility

Comments

This is an actual email:

http://foia2011.org/index.php?id=5718

  From: Phil Jones
  To: "Michael E. Mann"
  Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
  Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004

  ...

  I can't see either of these papers being in the next 
  IPCC report. Kevin [Trenberth] and I [Phil Jones] will 
  keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what 
  the peer-review literature is !

  ...

  Cheers
  Phil

  Prof. Phil Jones
  Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0)REDACTED
  School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0)REDACTED
  University of East Anglia

to fill in the ...

The other paper by MM is just garbage - as you knew. De Freitas again. Pielke is also losing all credibility as well by replying to the mad Finn as well - frequently as I see it. I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report.

....and they were included anyway

Doesn't mean global warming isn't happening.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.