The most interesting part is Boris' recommendation to delete your Claude.md every 6 months to see what the model is capable of. The link in the post sends you directly to that moment.
Seems like something they should work on, not customers. Reinventing my workflow every six months because a company/product is lazy is not high on my list.
I've seen this particular in the post and others from Anthropic make similar claims of "oh, just do this or that", and I've always been of the opinion: "isn't this what everyone is paying Anthropic to do?".
It would have been nice to hear about how to be more efficient, task/token wise, especially with Opus 5.
Most users are on a subscription, and aren’t able to run dynamic workflows, spinning up 1000 agents or leaving a bun rewrite going for weeks. Don’t get me wrong… I like cake.
Comments
The most interesting part is Boris' recommendation to delete your Claude.md every 6 months to see what the model is capable of. The link in the post sends you directly to that moment.
Seems like something they should work on, not customers. Reinventing my workflow every six months because a company/product is lazy is not high on my list.
What I read from that is that there's a chance claude gets worse using a claude.md and that's a usability issue on their side.
I've seen this particular in the post and others from Anthropic make similar claims of "oh, just do this or that", and I've always been of the opinion: "isn't this what everyone is paying Anthropic to do?".
It would have been nice to hear about how to be more efficient, task/token wise, especially with Opus 5.
Most users are on a subscription, and aren’t able to run dynamic workflows, spinning up 1000 agents or leaving a bun rewrite going for weeks. Don’t get me wrong… I like cake.