Skip to content

Comment on Elevated errors on Claude Opus 5parent

Comments

I remember when 4.7 and 4.8 were released and people were asking what's wrong with them and 4.6 is the best.

But yes, I also think it's not the greatest model for programming. On the other hand, for agentic tasks that are not programming related it's hard to beat Opus 4.8. It can try different things and pivot even when the user is not great with prompting. 5.0 seems to not be worse, but definitely wastes more tokens and costs more.

4.6 was better in some way that I can’t put my finger on. None of the models since have been able to reproduce its quality of output for me.

is, not was. Thankfully 4.6 is still being served by Anthropic.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.