I like the name, the typography's decent, and I'm fond of that shade of green. The layout is very, very messy. It feels like a poorly-styled tumblelog, what with the huge emphasis on snippets and the constant centered-ness of everything.
For some reason, the linear display of one quote after another doesn't work for me at all. It feels loose. A portfolio should feel denser, like it's bursting with interesting things everywhere you look. But perhaps that's just the ugliness of the centered-quotes approach.
But seriously, rethink the quotes-only approach. Writing is about so much more than quick snippets. I know plenty of brilliant writers who would be grossly underserviced by this approach – Gene Weingarten and David Foster Wallace are two authors whose styles are drastically different but which are each difficult to "snippet" meaningfully. Your challenge, if you want to make a site like this, is to make a site that respects writing, as deeply and as thoroughly as is possible without sacrificing snappiness and elegance.
That said, you're working on something that would make the Internet a better place -- oh wait! I just realized you're from Elepath! Is this an official Elepath project then? That's neat, and good luck to you and Jakob and the rest of the team.
Really appreciate the feedback. You make some great points, and it's clear that what I've got at this stage falls short of truly showing off writing in a way respectful to the writing. The pullquote format is actually left over, so to speak, from the previous iteration of Boldfaced, which was solely for copywriters. Based on feedback, I decided to shift gears and focus on helping any kind of writer show off their work.
And yep, this is an Elepath project. Thanks for kind words. :)
>But seriously, rethink the quotes-only approach. Writing is about so much more than quick snippets.
I agree. When I read the blurb of the website, I thought "okay, it's a place to show off writing; awesome," and I was actually confused by the just-quotes format. Quotes do not make writing. I was hoping that clicking one of the quotes would bring me to an essay, story, or longer excerpt of writing, but no dice.
Many of the quotes on the sample page beg for context, and my eyes glazed over as I scrolled down the page.
Sure, the page looks neat at first glance, but I'm not really sure what this website is trying to achieve. I like to write poems and short stories and I am an avid reader. I don't really see one-line quotes as a way to show off that kind of work, and I wouldn't buy a novel based off one line. But perhaps I'm missing the point of the website?
You're certainly not missing the point; the pull quotes clearly aren't cutting it. :) Going to spend the weekend reworking the way work is presented. Ideally I'd like to offer a few templates for work, such that the user can pick short/medium/long-form, or, perhaps make it based specifically on the category (poem, novel, tagline, etc.)
The intention of the site is to help writers show off work elegantly, though, seems I'm not quite there yet.
I agree with the centered-ness. Either the copy needs to be really well formatted to work with all of the centered text, (and even then what happens on mobile) or you should drop the center (you can keep it in key spots if necessary) because it makes things hard to read.
Comments
I like the name, the typography's decent, and I'm fond of that shade of green. The layout is very, very messy. It feels like a poorly-styled tumblelog, what with the huge emphasis on snippets and the constant centered-ness of everything.
For some reason, the linear display of one quote after another doesn't work for me at all. It feels loose. A portfolio should feel denser, like it's bursting with interesting things everywhere you look. But perhaps that's just the ugliness of the centered-quotes approach.
But seriously, rethink the quotes-only approach. Writing is about so much more than quick snippets. I know plenty of brilliant writers who would be grossly underserviced by this approach – Gene Weingarten and David Foster Wallace are two authors whose styles are drastically different but which are each difficult to "snippet" meaningfully. Your challenge, if you want to make a site like this, is to make a site that respects writing, as deeply and as thoroughly as is possible without sacrificing snappiness and elegance.
That said, you're working on something that would make the Internet a better place -- oh wait! I just realized you're from Elepath! Is this an official Elepath project then? That's neat, and good luck to you and Jakob and the rest of the team.
Really appreciate the feedback. You make some great points, and it's clear that what I've got at this stage falls short of truly showing off writing in a way respectful to the writing. The pullquote format is actually left over, so to speak, from the previous iteration of Boldfaced, which was solely for copywriters. Based on feedback, I decided to shift gears and focus on helping any kind of writer show off their work.
And yep, this is an Elepath project. Thanks for kind words. :)
>But seriously, rethink the quotes-only approach. Writing is about so much more than quick snippets.
I agree. When I read the blurb of the website, I thought "okay, it's a place to show off writing; awesome," and I was actually confused by the just-quotes format. Quotes do not make writing. I was hoping that clicking one of the quotes would bring me to an essay, story, or longer excerpt of writing, but no dice.
Many of the quotes on the sample page beg for context, and my eyes glazed over as I scrolled down the page.
Sure, the page looks neat at first glance, but I'm not really sure what this website is trying to achieve. I like to write poems and short stories and I am an avid reader. I don't really see one-line quotes as a way to show off that kind of work, and I wouldn't buy a novel based off one line. But perhaps I'm missing the point of the website?
You're certainly not missing the point; the pull quotes clearly aren't cutting it. :) Going to spend the weekend reworking the way work is presented. Ideally I'd like to offer a few templates for work, such that the user can pick short/medium/long-form, or, perhaps make it based specifically on the category (poem, novel, tagline, etc.)
The intention of the site is to help writers show off work elegantly, though, seems I'm not quite there yet.
Thanks for the feedback!
I agree with the centered-ness. Either the copy needs to be really well formatted to work with all of the centered text, (and even then what happens on mobile) or you should drop the center (you can keep it in key spots if necessary) because it makes things hard to read.