> Most-all of the people I’ve talked to that are strongly anti-LLM and anti-AI are oddly silent on the subject of models like GLM 5.2 and other modern open-weight models that are “good enough” for assistance now, and in another year will likely be as good as Fable or 5.6 today. I suspect this is because they are larpers and aren’t actually keeping track of the technology.

It's really pointless to try to engage with that sort of attitude: I'm right and everyone who disagrees with me is just larpers but I'll go ahead and strawman them so I can have something to write about online. Why should I read that? To waste my time and feel insulted?

Btw, I'm not anti-AI, but one doesn't have to be, to be critical of the current LLM market, but hey, I'm just larping eh?