Quoting a chatbot in an article that is not related to a chatbot felt offputting and weird. I had to stop reading, because it somehow undermined any interest i had in the article
I dont think so. Admittedtly I live in a peculiar bubble (mix of scientists, artists and programmers) but nobody that I know personally talks about chatbots in neutral terms, let alone in favorable ones.
If we take chatgpt and the ones from the other brands as neutral entities we as a society have a lot of work and self-reflection to do.
Comments
Quoting a chatbot in an article that is not related to a chatbot felt offputting and weird. I had to stop reading, because it somehow undermined any interest i had in the article
This will become more popular - using ai as a neutral entity. I think it has its place and works well but can be abused
I dont think so. Admittedtly I live in a peculiar bubble (mix of scientists, artists and programmers) but nobody that I know personally talks about chatbots in neutral terms, let alone in favorable ones.
If we take chatgpt and the ones from the other brands as neutral entities we as a society have a lot of work and self-reflection to do.