Comment on PostHog FOSSComments−thatxlinerOP2moDoes anyone know what the context for this is? Because https://github.com/PostHog/posthog exists as well−lfittl2moMy assumption is that its based on that repo but with the "ee/" folder removed, per https://github.com/PostHog/posthog#open-source-vs-paidPresumably so folks can be sure they're not accidentally pulling in proprietary code.−eightysixfour2moFrom the repo you linked:This repo is available under the MIT expat license, except for the ee directory (which has its license here) if applicable.Need absolutely 100% FOSS? Check out our posthog-foss repository, which is purged of all proprietary code and features.−theHocineSaad2moFrom the repo's about section: PostHog FOSS is a read-only mirror of PostHog, with all proprietary code removed. NOTE: This repo is synced automatically from the main PostHog repo. Please raise any issues and PRs there.−carimura2moThe PostHog Enterprise license (the “Enterprise License”)−coloneltcb2moOpen* is not Open
Comments
Does anyone know what the context for this is? Because https://github.com/PostHog/posthog exists as well
My assumption is that its based on that repo but with the "ee/" folder removed, per https://github.com/PostHog/posthog#open-source-vs-paid
Presumably so folks can be sure they're not accidentally pulling in proprietary code.
From the repo you linked:
From the repo's about section: PostHog FOSS is a read-only mirror of PostHog, with all proprietary code removed. NOTE: This repo is synced automatically from the main PostHog repo. Please raise any issues and PRs there.
The PostHog Enterprise license (the “Enterprise License”)
Open* is not Open