Comment on Google copybara: moving code between repositoriesComments−bellowsgulch2moI already shared git-fetch-file in another comment here, but the .git-remote-files manifests seem a lot nicer than whatever this thing does: [file "lib/util.py" from "https://github.com/example/tools.git"] commit = a1b2c3d4e5f6789abcdef0123456789abcdef01 branch = master comment = Common utility function [file "config.json" from "https://github.com/example/tools.git"] commit = b2c3d4e5f6789abcdef0123456789abcdef012 branch = master target = vendor comment = Configuration from tools repo [file "helper.js" from "https://github.com/another/project.git"] commit = c3d4e5f6789abcdef0123456789abcdef0123 branch = main comment = Helper from another project vs core.workflow( name = "default", origin = git.github_origin( url = "https://github.com/google/copybara.git", ref = "master", ), destination = git.destination( url = "file:///tmp/foo", ), # Copy everything but don't remove a README_INTERNAL.txt file if it exists. destination_files = glob(["third_party/copybara/**"], exclude = ["README_INTERNAL.txt"]), authoring = authoring.pass_thru("Default email <default@default.com>"), transformations = [ core.replace( before = "//third_party/bazel/bashunit", after = "//another/path:bashunit", paths = glob(["**/BUILD"])), core.move("", "third_party/copybara") ], ) There seems to be an absolute ton of reference at https://github.com/google/copybara/blob/master/docs/referenc..., whereas I feel like all the people using git-fetch-file just want files from other repos, and sometimes to make some changes on those.
Comments
I already shared git-fetch-file in another comment here, but the .git-remote-files manifests seem a lot nicer than whatever this thing does:
vs There seems to be an absolute ton of reference at https://github.com/google/copybara/blob/master/docs/referenc..., whereas I feel like all the people using git-fetch-file just want files from other repos, and sometimes to make some changes on those.