I'm not sure if you're just intentionally being ridiculous or mistakenly thinking that you've got a good reductio ad absurdum argument going on. In any case, why exactly are you conflating "wildly popular" with "extremely valuable?"

Even if the grandparent post was about popularity, your statement is as unconstructive as this argument would be:

A: "You're intentionally putting way too many non-criminals in jail."

B: 'Ah, but for the purpose of setting boundaries, consider the extreme case where we don't put anyone in jail at all.'