They conflate domain expertise with coding expertise, and then assess that people with domain expertise demonstrate great success at coding tasks
I didn't read it as such - I read that people with expertise have more success in reaching the goal of the session. Still your point stands = how is this news?
What baffles me, is that expertise of writing code is not important and is hand waved away = non-technical person can reach their goal and the session will be deemed successful. They don't conflate that domain expert = developer, and they dismiss that expertise (ie. updating legal rules matters, not how they are implemented) so i'm confused. Shouldn't both matter?
Comments
I didn't read it as such - I read that people with expertise have more success in reaching the goal of the session. Still your point stands = how is this news?
What baffles me, is that expertise of writing code is not important and is hand waved away = non-technical person can reach their goal and the session will be deemed successful. They don't conflate that domain expert = developer, and they dismiss that expertise (ie. updating legal rules matters, not how they are implemented) so i'm confused. Shouldn't both matter?