That sounds horrible. All of the added complexity of a heavyweight framework without any of the advantages. Most frameworks have an option to cache the output if you want to go that route, then you'll get the performance of a static site without losing the flexibility.
Comments
bash and wget.
Simple example:
Bash, markdown and hope.
Sample...
http://sohcahtoa.org.uk/pages/publish-a-web-site-with-bash-s...
it is horrid, but it works for me.
Seriously, how about a voting option for something like 'homebrew'?
Kinda.
When I need a 'static' site I just use whichever CMS/framework is best and wget --mirror the output.
That sounds horrible. All of the added complexity of a heavyweight framework without any of the advantages. Most frameworks have an option to cache the output if you want to go that route, then you'll get the performance of a static site without losing the flexibility.