Skip to content

Comment on How Facebook can avoid losing revenue when they switch to always-on SSL

Comments

Not really; as they say in the post itself, "Facebook’s business is different than Amazons and the impact on their business will be different."

Amazon's core business is selling stuff to customers: additional latency might occasionally turn away a customer. In Amazon's scale, that's a million-dollar opportunity.

Facebook's core business is having users click on ads: at first, latency's role there might seem insignificant, but it is an interesting intellectual exercise to figure out whether it really matters in Facebook's scale.

Even more interesting would be if you had some data to show precisely how much.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.