Anyone else getting sick of conservatives & religious zealots on their everlasting "nude is bad!" crusade?
Plain nudity in a non-sexual context (eg. naturism, or within a family), minors exploring the bodies of themselves & their peers, sex education, nude art, scandinavian style sauna's, medical subjects, the list of may-involve-nudity-but-harmless-to-minors goes on & on.
These UK politicians serious about banning all the above & more, as soon as it comes near a kids' smartphone? Idiots, they're the ones hurting minors here.
This is not "nude is bad", this is establishing a framework for all content scanning.
UK has frozen accounts of the organisations it CLAIMS might be sympathetic to the incorrectly proscibed organisation, as per the court of law which claims the government didn't follow its own guidance.
The creeps need to be able to find the dissidents before they have a zoom call.
Comments
Anyone else getting sick of conservatives & religious zealots on their everlasting "nude is bad!" crusade?
Plain nudity in a non-sexual context (eg. naturism, or within a family), minors exploring the bodies of themselves & their peers, sex education, nude art, scandinavian style sauna's, medical subjects, the list of may-involve-nudity-but-harmless-to-minors goes on & on.
These UK politicians serious about banning all the above & more, as soon as it comes near a kids' smartphone? Idiots, they're the ones hurting minors here.
This is not "nude is bad", this is establishing a framework for all content scanning.
UK has frozen accounts of the organisations it CLAIMS might be sympathetic to the incorrectly proscibed organisation, as per the court of law which claims the government didn't follow its own guidance.
The creeps need to be able to find the dissidents before they have a zoom call.
I'd argue that Labour and Starmer are neither