"profoundly not safe for anything" sounds like you're saying it exposes liars (i.e. is not safe for them) but is itself not always trustworthy (i.e. not safe to believe 100%), especially within the context of your earlier comments about untruth.
That you were trying to warn that it's NSFW was not at all clear.
Fair enough. Context fail on my part, the phrase "not safe for $foo" is given to include NSFW regardless of the value of $foo elsewhere it's hardly a guaranteed assumption.
If pg or someone wants to include an explicit NSFW in that comment I'd be much obliged.
Comments
You should be aware that moot has a long habit of being somewhat less than perfectly truthful with the media.
ED is profoundly not safe for anything: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Christopher_Poole
I thought I disclaimed it well enough but just in case: THE PREVIOUS LINK IS NSFW, REALLY REALLY NSFW. IN FACT THE ENTIRE SITE IT'S HOSTED ON IS NSFW.
"profoundly not safe for anything" sounds like you're saying it exposes liars (i.e. is not safe for them) but is itself not always trustworthy (i.e. not safe to believe 100%), especially within the context of your earlier comments about untruth.
That you were trying to warn that it's NSFW was not at all clear.
Fair enough. Context fail on my part, the phrase "not safe for $foo" is given to include NSFW regardless of the value of $foo elsewhere it's hardly a guaranteed assumption.
If pg or someone wants to include an explicit NSFW in that comment I'd be much obliged.
Maybe if you'd written it Not Safe For Anything, that would make the brain click correctly. I too misread your original.
might want to mention that there is gay porn there...you know for those people who are at work