Comment on How much of Thermo Fisher's antibody data has been manipulated?parentComments−raverbashing3moEditorial choices on raw scientific data are a big no-no.I don't think you can find a picture in an article that hasn't been photoshopped in one way or another (which is mostly ok as long as it is not misleading)Edit: TF's reply is interesting https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/life-science/antibod...Basically they say they are reviewing the images−flobosg3moUsually, journals require raw, unmodified data to be deposited as supplementary information.−raverbashing3moYes, as supplementary information(Also journals are usually more rigorous than marketing material)−flobosg3moYes, as supplementary informationStill part of the article.
Comments
I don't think you can find a picture in an article that hasn't been photoshopped in one way or another (which is mostly ok as long as it is not misleading)
Edit: TF's reply is interesting https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/life-science/antibod...
Basically they say they are reviewing the images
Usually, journals require raw, unmodified data to be deposited as supplementary information.
Yes, as supplementary information
(Also journals are usually more rigorous than marketing material)
Still part of the article.