then slipping malware into a repository wouldn't violate this law either, which we both know isn't true
their intent is clear: to destroy information on another person's computer, when that person expects that not to happen (it's a testing library, not a nuclear weapon)
Based on the wording of the law, I think the relevant transmission is when the damage-causing command goes to the LLM. Who causes that transmission? I would say it's the person who wrote software to generate the command.
Comments
If someone else installs it, the author didn't knowingly cause the transmission to the protected computer, the installer did
then slipping malware into a repository wouldn't violate this law either, which we both know isn't true
their intent is clear: to destroy information on another person's computer, when that person expects that not to happen (it's a testing library, not a nuclear weapon)
Based on the wording of the law, I think the relevant transmission is when the damage-causing command goes to the LLM. Who causes that transmission? I would say it's the person who wrote software to generate the command.