Comment on Racket v9.2parentComments−yladiz3moYour claim was that it could not be done in cpp, not that it was faster/simpler/whatever-new-goalpost-you're-now-presenting in racket.You need to reread the reply they made. They asked how you would do it in cpp, not that it’s not possible.I think this novel discovery is worth a turing award indeed! I'll be sure to refer you for one. Maybe even an honorary doctorate at my alma mater.You could have made your point sufficiently without being condescending.
Comments
You need to reread the reply they made. They asked how you would do it in cpp, not that it’s not possible.
You could have made your point sufficiently without being condescending.