Skip to content

Comment on Racket v9.2parent

Comments

Your claim was that it could not be done in cpp, not that it was faster/simpler/whatever-new-goalpost-you're-now-presenting in racket.

You need to reread the reply they made. They asked how you would do it in cpp, not that it’s not possible.

I think this novel discovery is worth a turing award indeed! I'll be sure to refer you for one. Maybe even an honorary doctorate at my alma mater.

You could have made your point sufficiently without being condescending.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.