Are you seriously going to claim that this is not LLM generated?
Do you see me making that claim? My comment seems to be about grammar. Do you always jump to conclusions?
I made no comment as to the validity of the construction.
See:
I mean look at this sentence which randomly contains the " - " pattern twice in a row
They're called parenthetical dashes. They're not random. And it's one pattern, not two. You'll find it used with parentheses (obviously) and commas as well as dashes and perhaps even other punctuation[1].
As to whether or not the post was written by AI, I don't care either way. That seems to be something you care about. But you shouldn't base those conclusions on the use of parenthetical dashes.
Comments
Are you seriously going to claim that this is not LLM generated?
https://alphapixeldev.com/what-is-a-mercenary-programmer-and...
The guys twitter account is full of LLM slop: https://x.com/alphapixel
Perhaps all these other posts from the same author in completely different styles are also not LLM generated? https://wildirismarketing.com/articles-and-blog-posts/
I made no comment as to the validity of the construction.
Do you see me making that claim? My comment seems to be about grammar. Do you always jump to conclusions?
See:
They're called parenthetical dashes. They're not random. And it's one pattern, not two. You'll find it used with parentheses (obviously) and commas as well as dashes and perhaps even other punctuation[1].
As to whether or not the post was written by AI, I don't care either way. That seems to be something you care about. But you shouldn't base those conclusions on the use of parenthetical dashes.
1: https://editorsmanual.com/articles/commas-vs-parentheses-vs-...