My thought would be that blocking the software itself, or the filter lists, probably falls under the First Amendment in the US, as was shown in the Bernstein and Junger cases.
But...making it illegal to present something different than what is sent? Well, that really sucks for the maker of that Flash ad I didn't see because I don't have Flash installed.
And what about the blind guy who uses Lynx to surf? Or the non-blind guy?
> And what about the blind guy who uses Lynx to surf? Or the non-blind guy?
Men of straw need not apply.
What about the struggling blogger (Brand Friedman?) unable to sustain his important and vital efforts on donations alone, who must turn to ads in order to eek out some revenue in order to continue?
Comments
My thought would be that blocking the software itself, or the filter lists, probably falls under the First Amendment in the US, as was shown in the Bernstein and Junger cases.
But...making it illegal to present something different than what is sent? Well, that really sucks for the maker of that Flash ad I didn't see because I don't have Flash installed.
And what about the blind guy who uses Lynx to surf? Or the non-blind guy?
> And what about the blind guy who uses Lynx to surf? Or the non-blind guy?
Men of straw need not apply.
What about the struggling blogger (Brand Friedman?) unable to sustain his important and vital efforts on donations alone, who must turn to ads in order to eek out some revenue in order to continue?