I remain completely unimpressed by marketing announcements that boil down to "the LLM wrote a toy version of something for which there are hundreds of undergraduate GitHub repositories in its training data", even if style transfer was involved, as was the case with the Claude C compiler.
This wasn't possible one year ago. It's not that exciting to recreate something that already exists but being able to reliably write boring code is what most customers need.
Comments
I remain completely unimpressed by marketing announcements that boil down to "the LLM wrote a toy version of something for which there are hundreds of undergraduate GitHub repositories in its training data", even if style transfer was involved, as was the case with the Claude C compiler.
This wasn't possible one year ago. It's not that exciting to recreate something that already exists but being able to reliably write boring code is what most customers need.