Skip to content

Comment on Basketball Stats: They all maximize what they think they’re being paid forparent

Comments

What does this post mean?

Michael Lewis is a non-fiction author. Most relevant to this thread, his name is instantly recognizable among people who are interested in the intersection of baseball and statistics, because he wrote Moneyball. The basic idea is that historically the market for talent in baseball has severely mispriced talent because it overpays for attributes that do not win ballgames. Thus, if one knew what actually won ballgames, one could thwomp the competition while spending much less money. And, sure enough, someone did just that.

For the rest of the story, I recommend the book. I have no interest in sports whatsoever but one of my stats geek friends does, and he accords it a place of honor in his bookshelf.

Also tangentially related, Rockets GM Daryl Morey is often referred to as "Moneyball Morey" by the basketball press.

"thwomp"? The Rockets are a good team but haven't won a championship and haven't been that competitive in the playoffs.

The "moneyball" idea doesn't translate quite as well in basketball. One, it's a significantly less statistical game than baseball. Athleticism doesn't translate perfectly to numbers and individual stats can be largely effected by teammates.

To answer your first point, though I haven't read the book, I suspect it's about a baseball team and GP didn't want to reveal the ending.

Almost certainly, in the most competitive professional league other teams will also be armed with statisticians.

That the linked article is by Michael Lewis. A very important data point, since I would probably read Michael Lewis if he just reprinted the phone directory. He would find some way to make those numbers compelling.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.