so it's wrong to give a T&C to a company that gives T&C to its users? You can't see the irony in this? or you are okay with it?
What? The person had stolen property in their possession. They weren't in a position to be dictating terms of the deal because they legally did not have the right to possess the property, which they were fully aware was not owned by the person they bought it from.
Comments
What? The person had stolen property in their possession. They weren't in a position to be dictating terms of the deal because they legally did not have the right to possess the property, which they were fully aware was not owned by the person they bought it from.
From your article: "It was the last time he ever saw the phone, right before he abandoned it on bar stool, leaving to go home."
Sounds like a clear cut case of theft to me. Absolutely