Watts and sustainability were never part of the Turing test, of course. It was conceived as more of a philosophical argument than a practical test.
For instance, consider Searle's Chinese Room counter argument [1]: Millions of humans emulating a computer program isn't the most efficient use of resources either, off course.
Comments
Watts and sustainability were never part of the Turing test, of course. It was conceived as more of a philosophical argument than a practical test.
For instance, consider Searle's Chinese Room counter argument [1]: Millions of humans emulating a computer program isn't the most efficient use of resources either, off course.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room