Lol, you convinced a LLM to agree with you. I use the Big5 as a way of communicating where there is a common reference and a large body of work. How people think they think and how they actually think are two different things, people are much closer to LLMs than they think they are. I can't provide evidence for this for a variety of reasons so at this point we're just going to have to agree to disagree.
Comments
Lol, you convinced a LLM to agree with you. I use the Big5 as a way of communicating where there is a common reference and a large body of work. How people think they think and how they actually think are two different things, people are much closer to LLMs than they think they are. I can't provide evidence for this for a variety of reasons so at this point we're just going to have to agree to disagree.
Actually, it's the other way around - I used LLM to think about it independently to check if my intuition made sense.
I agree with its arguments (and I generally found LLMs argue better than myself, that's why I use them).
It's disappointing that you dismiss it without providing a counterargument.
I have privileged access to information that I cannot share, I would rather keep my access than win some argument online.