Comment on Features of Solr vs. ElasticSearchparentComments−codewright13yYour Solr cluster kicked the bucket at 150QPS?Jesus dude. I couldn't reproduce that with my single or multi-node ElasticSearch clusters if I wanted to.How were the EBS backing stores setup for these EC2 nodes?Edit: Also, when I was talking about "them" falling apart, I meant Postgres or Sphinx, not Solr/ElasticSearch.Well-configured Solr and ElasticSearch clusters can work very well for most people.−fizx13yEBS shouldn't really matter, because with a reasonable heap, he should have 40-50G of available filesystem cache, and 48G of data.
Comments
Your Solr cluster kicked the bucket at 150QPS?
Jesus dude. I couldn't reproduce that with my single or multi-node ElasticSearch clusters if I wanted to.
How were the EBS backing stores setup for these EC2 nodes?
Edit: Also, when I was talking about "them" falling apart, I meant Postgres or Sphinx, not Solr/ElasticSearch.
Well-configured Solr and ElasticSearch clusters can work very well for most people.
EBS shouldn't really matter, because with a reasonable heap, he should have 40-50G of available filesystem cache, and 48G of data.