Skip to content

Comment on A sufficiently comprehensive spec is not (necessarily) code

Comments

Wayne is usually lots better than this. He basically defined the problem away, while missing the point of the comic. Maybe defined specifically "code" is not the tightly worded spec, but almost universally "code" is the result of the process of clarifying the vaguely worded spec. That's the point of the comic, after all. We all recognize the shorthand of "code" in the comic for the process we've all been through so many times.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.