Skip to content

Comment on Franklin's bad ads for Apple II clones and the beloved impersonator they depictparent

Comments

For what it's worth, I consider none of the aforementioned three devices to contain any artistic value whatsoever. The Apple II is an excellent computer, but entirely unjustifiable as an art exhibit.

I stand by my original statement that anything can make it's way into MOMA regardless of whether or not it's art.

Your original statement was:

I mean, if you put a Mac or MacOS in a museum next to Picasso, that would make many people cry.

Yet, MOMA has both a Mac and a Picasso, and you have not provided evidence of anyone feeling negatively about it other than yourself.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.