I think you are being a bit hysterical and trying to find an issue where there’s none.
The article is just trying to find an historical explanation on why something so inefficient became norm in modern civilization, there’s no sexism here…
So you think "doctors wanted to see better and didn't think it would hurt anything" and "It's all because of a Frenchman who decided it was more convenient – for men." are equally gender-agnostic?
Comments
I think you are being a bit hysterical and trying to find an issue where there’s none.
The article is just trying to find an historical explanation on why something so inefficient became norm in modern civilization, there’s no sexism here…
So you think "doctors wanted to see better and didn't think it would hurt anything" and "It's all because of a Frenchman who decided it was more convenient – for men." are equally gender-agnostic?