Skip to content

Comment on A case study in testing with 100+ Claude agents in parallelparent

Comments

The instinct should be to tweak the agent to do it right.

Ah, yes; must always remember to add "And don't make any mistakes" into the prompt /s

I am not entirely sure what you are referring to.

Improving the agent means improving the code base such that the agent can effectively work on it.

It can not Com as a surprise that an agent is better at working on a well documented code base with clear architecture.

On the other hand, if you expect that an agent can add the right amount of ketchup to your undocumented speghatti code, then you will continue to have a bad time.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.