Comment on Firm boosts H.264 streaming license fees from $100k up to staggering $4.5MparentComments−chromacity5moAs the article says, there are companies seeking royalties for both of these codecs.−mook5moThe funny thing about patent licensing alliances is that there's no guarantee that nobody else outside of the bloc will pop up and start suing people.Basically, you can consider AOM to be a licensing alliances, where the fee is zero.−adrian_b5moThere is no proof that their patent claims over AV1 or VP9 are valid.For now they try to bully some smaller companies with the threat of the big legal expenses that would be needed to fight these claims.−throawayonthe5moi don't think Snap Inc. and Amazon are small companies−asadotzler5moSeeking is not getting, not even close. Suggesting it is only supports their propaganda and adds momentum to their bogus race to a cash grab.
Comments
As the article says, there are companies seeking royalties for both of these codecs.
The funny thing about patent licensing alliances is that there's no guarantee that nobody else outside of the bloc will pop up and start suing people.
Basically, you can consider AOM to be a licensing alliances, where the fee is zero.
There is no proof that their patent claims over AV1 or VP9 are valid.
For now they try to bully some smaller companies with the threat of the big legal expenses that would be needed to fight these claims.
i don't think Snap Inc. and Amazon are small companies
Seeking is not getting, not even close. Suggesting it is only supports their propaganda and adds momentum to their bogus race to a cash grab.