I'm not sure if they are still doing it, but they used to work on the highest voted stuff as a priority; so if you want a feature, vote.
Also, I'm working on Snappy compression with Mongo (it's already used for the journal), however it's not currently stable and work is sporadic due to my startup.
Compression could have drawbacks on documents that get updated frequently. But it will be extremely useful on documents that get created and rarely/never change, coincidentally what I mostly have.
It would also greatly help if keys are compressed or indexed in some way since it could be done transparently.
You may recall the Mongo team being reluctant to make the database function well in single server setups, but they did address that with journalling.
Comments
There is a ticket for compression of both keys and values https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-164
The Mongo team seem somewhat reluctant to implement it.
I'm not sure if they are still doing it, but they used to work on the highest voted stuff as a priority; so if you want a feature, vote.
Also, I'm working on Snappy compression with Mongo (it's already used for the journal), however it's not currently stable and work is sporadic due to my startup.
It's probably not a clear win in most use-cases.
Reducing the working set is a big win. Mongo's behaviour when the working set is larger than RAM is really bad- https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-574
Compression could have drawbacks on documents that get updated frequently. But it will be extremely useful on documents that get created and rarely/never change, coincidentally what I mostly have.
It would also greatly help if keys are compressed or indexed in some way since it could be done transparently.
You may recall the Mongo team being reluctant to make the database function well in single server setups, but they did address that with journalling.